The future of plastics: reusing the bad and encouraging the good
Plastics have got themselves a bad name, mainly for two reasons: most are made from petroleum and they end up as litter in the environment.
However, both of these are quite avoidable. An increased focus on bio-derived and degradable composites as well as recycling could lessen pollution, and in fact, plastics could make a positive contribution to the environment.
This is the view of Professor Kim Pickering, an expert in material science and engineering at the University of Waikato. This article has been republished from The Conversation under Creative Commons licence CC BY-ND 4.0.
Plastic bag on a coral reef
Discarded plastic bags are a hazard to marine life.
Plastics for bad
The durability of plastics makes them so useful, but at the same time, it turns them into a persistent (and increasingly big) blot on the landscape, or more importantly the seascape, once discarded.
We’ve known for a while that bulk plastics are polluting the oceans. Converging sea currents are accumulating plastic waste in a floating island known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which now covers an area larger than Greenland. The bigger bits of plastic are life-threatening to marine life and seabirds. They can strangle marine mammals or birds and build up in their stomachs and guts.
More recently, awareness of microplastics has raised concern about their ubiquitous presence in the food chain. Commentators suggest that, by 2050, there will be as much plastic in the sea as there are fish. Who wants to go catch some plastic then?
Beyond that, plastic production currently relies on petroleum, and that has raised issues about health hazards generally associated with petroleum-based products during production, use and disposal.
Plastics for good
Plastics can contribute positively to the environment in the following ways:
Reduced food wastage
Between one-quarter and one-third of all food produced is wasted through spoilage. But without plastic packaging, it would be considerably worse and have a larger carbon footprint.
Many recycling enthusiasts do not think about throwing out spoiled food that required energy in terms of planting, cultivating, harvesting and transporting and therefore will have added to greenhouse gas emissions.
Lightweight transport
The use of plastics in transportation (cars, trains and planes) will reduce fuel consumption. Their application (along with reinforcing fibres) in aerospace as alternatives to traditional metallic alloys has brought huge gains in fuel efficiency over the last few decades.
Incorporation of fibre-reinforced plastics in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, for example, has resulted in fuel efficiencies that are similar to a family car (when measured by kilometres travelled per person). By the way, carbon fibre, the aerospace fibre of choice, is produced from plastic.
There are good things about plastics including benefits for the environment, but is it possible to make use of the good aspects and avoid the bad?
Ātea-1 rocket
The Ātea-1 rocket launched by Rocket Lab has a nose cone made of carbon fibre composite and coated with thermal ablative to protect it from extreme temperatures. Carbon fibre is produced from plastic.
Future-proofing plastics
Plastics are, chemically speaking, long chains or large cross-linked structures most commonly made up of a framework of carbon atoms.
For a long time, we have been using bio-derived plastics – naturally occurring materials such as animal skins including leather, gut and wood. These forms of plastic are complicated chemical structures that can only be made in nature at this stage.
Some of the early synthesised plastics were made from naturally occurring materials such as casein (from dairy) that was used for simple items such as buttons. The development of petroleum-based plastics has been a major distraction from such materials.
However, in the last couple of decades, bio-derived plastics have become available that provide good replacements. These include starch-based plastics such as polylactide (PLA), which is produced from corn starch, cassava roots or sugarcane and processed in the same way as petroleum-based plastics. Such plastics can be foamed or used to make drink bottles.
Recycling plastics is another essential step towards reducing the environmental load. Let’s face it: it is people who are doing the littering, not the plastics themselves. More effort could go into waste collection, and a carrot/stick approach should include disincentives for littering and a plastic tax that would exclude recycled plastics.
Incentives are also needed to encourage product development that takes account of the full life cycle. In Europe, for instance, legislation has made it compulsory in the automotive industry for at least 85% of a car to be recycled. This has had a dramatic influence on the materials and design used in the industry.
Even with best efforts, it is unrealistic that we would capture all plastics for recycling. Biodegradable plastics could be a useful tool for preventing environmental damage. PLA is biodegradable, though slow to break down, and there are other forms available.
Compostable plastic
Polylactic acid or polylactide (PLA) is a plant-based resin that will degrade under certain conditions. It requires processing at industrial composting sites. It is unlikely to break down in a landfill system or home compost bin.
This highlights the need for more research into controlling biodegradability, taking into account different applications and the need for infrastructure to deal with biodegradable plastics at the end of their life. Obviously, we don’t want our planes biodegrading during their 20 years of service, but one-use water bottles should break down within a short time after use.
The planet doesn’t have to become a toxic rubbish dump. In the short term, this will need some government action to encourage bio-derived, recyclable and biodegradable plastics to allow them to compete with petroleum-based products.
There are signs of improvement: increasing awareness of the harm plastics cause and a willingness of consumers to pay for plastic bags or to ban them. We need to stop dumping in our own backyard and remember that the environment is where we live. We ignore it at our peril.
Related articles
Professor Kim Pickering has been working with sustainable biomaterials for many years. Read about her efforts to produce skateboards and surfboards out of harakeke (flax).
Read about the history of plastics in Plastics and recycling.
New Zealand science organisations Royal Society Te Apārangi and the Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor have created reports and resources to help us rethink plastic.
Flight Plastics was the first New Zealand company to close the PET recycling loop when it opened the country’s first PET wash and recycling plant.
Learn more about bioplastics and how two Kiwi companies are using bioplastics to turn waste into products: earthpac potato plates and Zespri biospife. Microplastics are a growing threat to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
Where does plastic go when it gets dropped into the seas around New Zealand? The Ocean Plastic Simulator shows you.
Plastic is a wicked problem. It’s incredibly useful, but it’s also a huge environmental issue. A helpful resource is Thinking about plastic – planning pathways which includes our interactive planning pathway – use this to begin a cross-curricular look at plastics.
Related activities
Younger audiences will enjoy these activities:
Waste – a growing challenge! has resources to get students thinking about recycling and then taking action.
Useful links
This National Ocean Service article provides information about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
National Geographic informs us that nearly every seabird on Earth is eating plastic.
Find out more about Kim Pickering in this profiles= from Engineering New Zealand.
The Royal Society of New Zealand has produced plastic factsheets – learn about plastic use, pollution and how to take action.
Acknowledgement
This article was written by Kim Pickering (Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Waikato).
The article was originally published on The Conversation, 20 November 2017. Read the original article.
The Conversation
The Conversation is an independent source of news and views, sourced from the academic and research community and delivered direct to the public.
