Testing glycaemic load

The Lifestyle Foods research team test the loads of foods either in the laboratory or in human subjects . What advantages does each strategy offer?

Transcript

Alison Wallace, We can use two models to test for of a food. We have an model, where we take things in a test tube and see how they affect the blood response of a food. We also have a human model, where we use real-life examples.

John Monro, But unfortunately it is very costly because people vary so much in their blood glucose responses. If you want to tell what the load is of a food, just because of the variation [between people], you have to have enough subjects to work out statistically what a average is for all those people.

Alison Wallace, With an in vitro model, we can actually test a lot more foods very quickly. The in vitro tool really has two purposes. One, it helps us to be able to develop foods and to find out whether our foods in our programme are worthy of taking to a . The other one is that we are hoping ultimately it will give industry a much faster and easier way to measure blood glucose response of their foods.